How We Research and Use Sources

Source order

1. Current CDC, FDA, USPSTF, and public-health surveillance resources
2. Professional urology and primary-care guidelines
3. Systematic reviews and large, well-designed human studies
4. Official reporting and guideline documents with publication dates and populations

How claims are handled

We separate established guidance, research findings, practical reader steps, and unknowns. A seller, organization, or press release may document what that party says; it does not independently prove the claim.

How Our Health Evidence Pages Are Built and Checked

Each page starts from the questions readers search, such as what a study’s follow-up period means for a headline risk figure. The draft is built from the maker’s published material, like a supplement label’s listed dose, alongside government sources such as the NIH and MedlinePlus and current published studies, with links placed beside the sentences that rely on them.

AI tools draft each page from that gathered material. Before publication, automated checks test claims and wording, and a separate AI system reviews the draft against its source material. The people who run this site set the method, choose which sources count, and review pages in samples.

Freshness

Health, safety, legal, regulatory, and school-policy information can change. Pages should show a review date and be checked again when guidance or the underlying evidence changes.

What we never invent

We do not invent hands-on testing, credentials, interviews, institutional affiliations, quotations, study results, or personal outcomes.